Enhancing your ATS is a waste of money unless you’re doing this one thing
By Andrew Gilchrist

 

Recent Blog Posts

Three reasons to modernize your PeopleSoft Candidate Gateway

If you’re still using the basic PeopleSoft Candidate Gateway, you could be making your recruiters’ job even harder. PeopleSoft’s dated and plain interface is difficult at the best of times, but on a mobile device, it’s overwhelming.

How to Improve Your PeopleSoft or Taleo ATS Performance

Right or wrong, they expect that your application portal is an accurate representation of your company’s culture. If your portal looks unprofessional or is hard to use, or if they can’t complete their application, it paints a picture of a difficult organization. They have no reason to think that your company is the forward-thinking, leading edge firm that it is.

Don’t get lapped by the mobile recruiting revolution

In a recent survey of applicants, 89% reported that they use their mobile phone to search for jobs. But, a recruitment survey found that only 59% of employers offer applicants the opportunity to apply through a mobile phone. What does that mean for mobile applicants?

Make your first impression a lasting impression

Taleo is used by 5,000 companies, including half of the Fortune 100. It is considered a robust and flexible recruiting platform by many; complicated and unfriendly by others, with configuration and implementation challenges being the most commonly noted drawbacks.

Has Your ATS Bumped into OFCCP Yet?

A properly configured ATS can be your most valuable asset when faced with an OFCCP audit, but only if you make sure it’s following the right protocols and collecting the right information.

How Mobile is PeopleSoft Candidate Gateway?

Today’s candidates expect a company’s career site to be mobile-optimized, not only to allow them to search for jobs, but also to upload their LinkedIn profile or resume, and complete the application process from their mobile device.

How Mobile is Taleo?

Taleo is used by 5,000 companies, including half of the Fortune 100. It is considered a robust and flexible recruiting platform by many; complicated and unfriendly by others, with configuration and implementation challenges being the most commonly noted drawbacks.